<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cyber security issues with Smart Grid go way beyond metering devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2009/03/21/cyber-security-issues-with-smart-grid-go-way-beyond-metering-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2009/03/21/cyber-security-issues-with-smart-grid-go-way-beyond-metering-devices/</link>
	<description>All manner of goodness respecting the secure operation of digital systems.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob A</title>
		<link>http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2009/03/21/cyber-security-issues-with-smart-grid-go-way-beyond-metering-devices/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/?p=185#comment-234</guid>
		<description>There are a number of factors and significant depate.  Google for "wind baseload generation".

A Stanford study determined that if you have geographically dispersed, electrically interconnected windfarms, a reasonable number to use is  35% of their measured output (not nameplate) as reliable base load.

I interpret this to mean that if you have 1000MW of load to meet, you would have to have ~3x the output active (3000 MW).

And based on wind industries own reliability numbers, you need 3x that for 24x7 operations because of forced outages and maintenance, or 9000MW

Because of this, most jurisdictions are setting up wind farm contracts as "generate all you can, whenever you can, unless we dispatch you off".

Wind has already been the key factor in a number of large scale blackouts/near blackouts:

http://www.flat-group.co.uk/information/blackout-report-hints-at-wind-turbines-cause.html
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1478197501.html

Obviously, our grid infrastructure isn't ready for wind baseload here in North America.

-Rob A&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of factors and significant depate.  Google for &#8220;wind baseload generation&#8221;.</p>
<p>A Stanford study determined that if you have geographically dispersed, electrically interconnected windfarms, a reasonable number to use is  35% of their measured output (not nameplate) as reliable base load.</p>
<p>I interpret this to mean that if you have 1000MW of load to meet, you would have to have ~3x the output active (3000 MW).</p>
<p>And based on wind industries own reliability numbers, you need 3x that for 24&#215;7 operations because of forced outages and maintenance, or 9000MW</p>
<p>Because of this, most jurisdictions are setting up wind farm contracts as &#8220;generate all you can, whenever you can, unless we dispatch you off&#8221;.</p>
<p>Wind has already been the key factor in a number of large scale blackouts/near blackouts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flat-group.co.uk/information/blackout-report-hints-at-wind-turbines-cause.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.flat-group.co.uk/information/blackout-report-hints-at-wind-turbines-cause.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1478197501.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1478197501.html</a></p>
<p>Obviously, our grid infrastructure isn&#8217;t ready for wind baseload here in North America.</p>
<p>-Rob A&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

