Sure, Citect got criticized in the first instance for a slow response to the original vulnerability (which they did fix) but it seems to me that a company replacing an article with a better, more useful article given further information is a positive thing, and that this is simply about posturing and self-promotion by one of the security companies (they know who they are!).

From what I can tell Citect are actually stepping up their security game and this is simply one example of it.