<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft’s disclosure policy opens doors for malware writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2006/05/24/microsoft%e2%80%99s-disclosure-policy-opens-doors-for-malware-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2006/05/24/microsoft%e2%80%99s-disclosure-policy-opens-doors-for-malware-writers/</link>
	<description>All manner of goodness respecting the secure operation of digital systems.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2006/05/24/microsoft%e2%80%99s-disclosure-policy-opens-doors-for-malware-writers/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrgross.com/blogs/security/2006/05/24/microsoft%e2%80%99s-disclosure-policy-opens-doors-for-malware-writers/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that if MS fails to disclose a vulnerability that it knows about and that vulnerability is then used to hack into, say, the Bank of America, MS would be on the hook for considerable cost. Not disclosing a flaw in a product is no defense against damage, as car manufacturers have learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that if MS fails to disclose a vulnerability that it knows about and that vulnerability is then used to hack into, say, the Bank of America, MS would be on the hook for considerable cost. Not disclosing a flaw in a product is no defense against damage, as car manufacturers have learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

